Steve Benson


reading @ Segue


2013

(photo by Jude Ornstein)

Steve Benson: 3 works

A long reading in two sets
at EyeMediae, Ann Arbor, mid-80s
(Published in Blue Books as “Voice Overs”)

Reading at Hallwalls in Buffalo, 2008

Erika Staiti’s Rice-Paper-Moonlight
(Combining an improvised reading
by Benson from 2003,
a night-time train ride
& the song Wow!
by Jackie-O Motherfucker)

Steve Benson’s reading / performance
at the Medium & Margin Conference in Berkeley

Click here if you have problems viewing this

Steve’s text, a note on his project
& the conference proposal

photo by Ben Friedlander

When Lyn Hejinian’s book My Life first was published by Burning Deck in 1980, I couldn’t read it for a year. Every time I opened it, I found myself staring at the new sentence in as pure a form as I had seen outside of my own Ketjak, published two years earlier by This Press, but written four years before that back when This Press editor Barrett Watten & I had shared a flat on San Francisco’s Potrero Hill. Then, one evening, returning from Baltimore to the Bay Area after what may have been my first East Coast reading tour, I opened Lyn’s volume up on the airplane and read the book cover to cover, stunned at what a wonderful work it was. Whatever impetus Lyn may have gotten from my work, she had taken it in a different direction & accomplished something unbelievably wonderful in the process. While I know that My Life is not her own favorite work – poets I think must always be focused on what they’re doing now & what they’ve done most recently – I think it’s no accident that My Life, whether in the 1980 37 years in 37 paragraphs of 37 sentences each version or in the (to my eye, slightly more diffuse) later Sun & Moon edition, 43 years in 43 paragraphs of 43 sentences each, will always be her defining work for many readers, virtually all of them ardent fans as a result of the experience. My Life is deservedly one of the classics of the 20^th century.

I had something of the same experience reading Steve Benson’s Open Clothes this summer. Like My Life’s relationship to Ketjak, the last 83 pages of Open Clothes consists, with one major exception, of works written entirely in questions, the same device used in my own Sunset Debris, first published in Roof VII in 1978, and later published in book form by Roof in 1986 as part of its abbreviated version of The Age of Huts¹. To this day, it’s still the text I’m mostly like to read from if & when I’m reading to an audience that I expect will not have much experience with either my work or post-avant writing in general, as when I’ve read with Robert Hunter, whose years as the lyricist for the Grateful Dead brings in a somewhat different crowd than usually shows up at my events.

All of which means that when I open up Open Clothes, the 800-pound gorilla I have to get out of the way in order to read this text is myself. That’s not an easy process.

One way is to ask what isn’t simply the replication of Sunset Debris, much in the way that I was, on the plane trip, able to see for the first time that Lyn was doing something other (and more) than reduplicating my mode of disjunctive sentences from Ketjak. In her case, she turned the language literally in a different direction, away from the phenomenological & obsessively reiterative approach I had used toward her own past. The work was not about perception nearly so much as it was recollection, almost literally. Then there was her formal organization, which was simultaneously elegant & taut.

The answer as to what isn’t replication is, as you might have suspected, pretty much everything. To a degree that I can’t think of in any other book, including for that matter My Life, a comparison of what I’ll call the question works in Open Clothes with Sunset Debris demonstrates just how much this structuring of syntax is simply exoskeletal detail & that the real meat of what goes on in poetry – in language itself, I suppose – occurs on a deeper level yet.

Benson is first of all an improviser, which means that, at least in some circumstances, he composes his poems in public. He discusses this process twice during Open Clothes, once in a series of “After Notes” at the back of the book and again in a transcribed Q&A session printed here among the poems. Benson describes some of this process in this paragraph of the “After Notes”:

I finally did read in New York in February 2003, on a bill with Andrew Levy, and my fully improvised performance is transcribed here as “Did the lights go out.” It was hard at first, in spite of lots of practice, to keep all the sentences interrogative, but I kept correcting myself as I went along, which is how I improvise – though usually I have no particular idea what is right. A few days later, I did the same reading again in Philadelphia, transcribed here as “If you stop to listen to yourself.” In each event, I thought of the opening line shortly before I stood up to begin, but I had no other lines, strategies, or topics figured out in advance. I did, however, remind myself to move around sometimes. A longer “process note” on this reading appears at the website of Kelly Writers House at http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~wh/visitors/stevebenson.html.² “Is your thinking about the words” is a verbatim transcript of the public discussion that followed the second reading, with a letter assigned to each speaker from the audience, alphabetically, in order of appearance.

If this sounds potentially awkward, it ought to. Whereas Sunset Debris is always, at all points, writing, that is “the written” in the classic sense, each sentence plotted out with an eye not only to internal construction but how its juxtaposition is going to enable the reader’s frame to evolve, Benson’s improvisations are exercises in ongoing thinking, tentativeness, uncertainty and creative leaps that enable his questions – often longer and more winding than anything I would come up with – to complete themselves. If, as Bob Perelman once described my prose work, every sentence is its own short story, many of the questions in Benson’s Open Clothes are cliffhangers. If the price to pay for this is the willingness to seem awkward in performance, Benson has made a great grace of this. When you are actually listening to these pieces, you experience the end of each question – I want to say “each question mark” – with the thrill of rescue, of survival.

I was in New York over the weekend and wandered about the Chelsea on Saturday looking at the galleries. At the Gagosian, Richard Serra’s latest show of rusting metallic sculptures has been held over – now more than a month beyond its original “pull date.” These pieces feel heavy & stolid to me – there is a roomful of slabs and one work, “Round,” is a large round cylinder, not one of the giant coils of his last show there (which I thought of at the time as Serra’s Cinnabon collection), but filled in, like a Jack & the Beanstalk version of the kind of cement guards intended to protect some parts of parking lots (like the entrance to supermarkets) from runaway vehicles. Sunset Debris feels heavy to me in much the same way now – a solid block of text, unrelieved battering of the reader with question after question. Benson doesn’t feel like this in the slightest.

Partly this is because Benson is questioning himself as much as he does the reader, which frankly is a more confident stance for a poet than the one I was able to take three decades back. When “you” appears here, Benson is solicitous, much more than accusatory:

Do you want a martini?
Do you want a second martini?

It is this same impulse, I think, that leads him to include the discussion with students & other poets from the Writers House event, just as tho it were another improvisation, another poem, in this book. The question for Steve Benson is a fundamentally inclusive, embracing gesture. I have to admit that I don’t think this is true for Sunset Debris, and that my work feels to me now much more about discerning borders – this is where the writer ends, the reader begins, a continual scratching of a mark in the sand with some anxiety (What was I so anxious about?) as to who might cross this and how.

Think, for a second, of Benson’s tone in this piece or segment from “Open Notebook”:

Is there any such thing as floating
backwards? How can I tell if my heart is closed?
Will I find a way to open compassion and courage
in knowing and accepting myself? What distracts
me? Did anyone else hear the mist dripping off
the trees this morning? How can our friendship
survive such poverty?

There may be other sections, other passages elsewhere in this book, closer in their intent to what I had in mind, but nowhere in Sunset Debris is there a space where that passage could have taken place. It would have been a stronger work had there been such a space at that moment in my life, but it wasn’t to be. I’m appalled to admit this, but nowhere in The Age of Huts does the word compassion appear. Talk about having to learn the simplest things last!

So I’m not the right person, obviously, to review Open Clothes, but I do want you to know that I think this book is important and powerful, but powerful not because of how Benson exercises or craves power, but rather because of the care with which he heeds power’s sharp & heavy edges. The result, for me, is a lesson I need to work on personally, perhaps more than it is about what makes for good or great poetry. But I want to thank Steve for the beautiful way he’s forced me to dance with that 800-lb gorilla in my life.

 

 

¹ The full suite of The Age of Huts consists of Ketjak, the three poems in the Roof edition (Sunset Debris, The Chinese Notebook and 2197) as well as two satellite works, Sitting Up, Standing, Taking Steps and BART. In the 1970s, when these works were mostly written, had not yet gotten to the point where I could get them published in a single volume. They will finally appear together for the first time next year when UC Press publishes The Age of Huts (compleat).

² A recording of the event in RealAudio format is also available there. PENNsound also has an MP3 of Benson’s New York event as part of its extensive Segue archive.

While I may not approve of the idea of having heroes in poetry, I do have a few of my own. One of these is – and has been for decades – Steve Benson. He has all the requisite elements: enormous courage to try new things, unblinking honesty as to what he is doing, a great mind, a gentle soul, and terrific writing chops. That’s an unbelievably rare combination of “must-have” qualities. I’ve learned an enormous amount from Benson in the 30-plus years I’ve known him, and the careful reader of my work will note pieces – Paradise in The Alphabet is one, BART is another – that could never have been written without his example & inspiration.

the ball (30 times in 2 days) takes the concept of the micropress right to the level of the nano – its 4¼-by-5½ inch pages are simply plain copier paper cut rather roughly in half, stapled twice for binding, the texts appearing on the right-hand side of the page only. No publisher, address or price is listed & I have no idea just how many copies Benson printed & sent out.

I flip the book open to its center page & read the following:

If I do this, does that exempt me from
having to do that? Side effects are numberless,
I vow to ignore them. In order to focus on the task
at hand, you’ve got to, uh . . . Just a glance at
the hourly news headlines – That’s enough! The
big picture: on the one hand there’s static, color
distortions, snow, that rolling image effect, more
focus problems, and the nerve-wracking jump
cuts; on the other hand there’s terror, denial,
numbness, overwhelment, obsessionality,
delirium, rage, and more trouble with the focus

This would seem to be – at once! – both an extremely casual, or at least casual-sounding, text & a remarkably tight one that both comments upon & enacts the mind’s challenge with focus in a media-driven world. I find myself dazzled at the gem of overwhelment, a perfect neologism coming as it does after terror, denial, / numbness. Overwhelment is exactly the right term to pull the text into utter clarity at that particular instant, setting up the remainder of that list perfectly. There is a comedy being enacted here – all these powerful & negative emotions ultimately have to give way to the problem of focus, whether we mean that word in its “bang the TV & see if that helps the reception” or purely internal context.

I flip to another example, slightly earlier in the sequence:

That was walking together. I held
you on a leash, and you decided
where we would go and at what
tempo. In five minutes we got about
twenty feet away from where we
started. But I was going to say,
rather, the discontinuity is at the
beginning. The end is interrupted,
true, but that’s artificial, arbitrary,
I mean, or illusory – I forget why.
Is this convincing? But the initial
entry, getting underway, weighing
anchor, setting pen to paper after not,
shifting frame so radically that one
”knows oneself to be” doing that which
one was not before then up to – that’s
where an interruption really occurs,
and where confusion and disorder reign,
as idea, act, being, consequence
jockey for position, uncertain of
advantage.

Again, that absolute balance between the off-the-cuff remark & a high philosophical treatise. Not really since Frank O’Hara has there been somebody who so completely masters these two levels of discourse simultaneously as seamlessly as does Benson. It’s a gift – I don’t think it can be learned & so much of what we do learn would seem only to get in its way. I give a big sigh, knowing that this is one skill that I will never have.

A note at the back explains the project:

Saturday and Sunday, April 23 and
24, 2005, every hour on the hour,
when my wristwatch alarm sounded,
I wrote five minutes in a brown book
Lyn gave me several years ago, as
well as I could. This is the transcript,
completed two weeks later.

Lyn presumably would be Lyn Hejinian, but that is in fact a presumption. Much of Benson’s work has always been about attention & one consequence of reading any batch or book of his writing is that the reader’s (this reader’s) own awareness is heightened as a direct result of the process. I love being in the middle of his texts, but when I set them down, I find that even the colors in the room seem brighter, the demarcations between instants more easy to see/hear/feel.

So far as I can tell, it was Benson who really pioneered the idea of “the sitting” – as in “write for five minutes” – as a unit for poetry. No doubt that is what many poets – think O’Hara, think Whalen, think Blackburn – have done for decades if not centuries. But it was Steve who really got it & was thus able to raise it up to the level of visibility, that any poet might be able to make use of the form. For Benson, for whom being present in the moment is so much what his writing is about, it’s a perfect fit, particularly as no two moments will ever be identical, yet they will always be sharing the same timeless truth: this is now. I turn again to another page, this time further back in the book:

Anyone can do it, but generally speaking,
few do. You can see it in the morning,
a subtle glimmer behind the glare. Whenever
treetops are brought plummeting down by
winter winds, lightning, or collisions, some
people, like animals, wake with a start. At
each evident instance, I start again. What
makes it seem one might be a perception
of ending, or it might be my refusal to
continue as I had been, as when, planning
or daydreaming or rehearsing recriminations,
I stop and notice that I am breathing again,
what color the moss is in this light, the
sounds no one is making

Here’s hoping the ball (30 times in 2 days) shows up in a newer, larger edition, so that everyone can read it, every word.